My August 14, 2007 Barry Bonds Letter
by Timothy Horrigan © 2007
Here is a letter I wrote to the Portsmouth Herald shortly after Barry Bonds broke Major League Baseball's career home run record. (It may in fact have been published as an op-ed piece: the paper never called me to say that they were running my letter, and I forgot to buy the August 14 dead-tree edition.)
I don't condone the use of steroids — not because they give baseball players an "unfair" advantage but rather because they are bad for your health. And I also think that excessive muscle mass is dangerous in and of itself, even if a kid uses "fair" and "natural" methods of bulking up. I don't have any particular feelings one way or the other about Bonds, although we do go a long way back: I remember reading about him in the L.A. Times sports page back in the 1980s when he was a teenage phenom.
I tend to have an odd affection for ballplayers who fuck up and set bad examples for the kiddies. When I was a Little Leaguer myself, two of my favorite players were Denny McLain and Pete Rose, arguably the two biggest fuck-ups in Major League history. Even back in the day, I knew just from reading their life stories that these were immensely talented but deeply flawed human beings. And I found that liberating, being a flawed human being myself.
In any case, the Bonds controversy isn't going away anytime soon. This year or next (or maybe a liitle later), he will retire. Five years after he retires, he comes up for a Hall of Fame vote, and many writers will vote against him even though he's one of the greatest players of all time. Even before those five years go by, baseball writers will be griping about how they won't be voting for him when his time does come.
Even before he retired, two of Bonds's more noteable contemporaries failed to get voted in, largely because of writers setting a precedent for not voting for Bonds himself. Mark McGwire might still get in. But Jose Canseco got only 1.1% of the vote (far short of a 5% threshold) when he appeared the ballot in 2006, and therefore he won't be on the ballot in the years ahead.
The original URL (may disappear or break at any moment):
There has been a lot of whining about the fact that Barry Bonds has broken what is often referred to as the "most revered" of all records.
There is even much talk about whether he deserves to be in the Hall of Fame.
His record, however, is just a number, just like any other record.
Barry Bonds happens to be the guy who hit more home runs than anyone else. Period. (Until someone else hits more.)
Sometimes records are held by nice guys (e.g., Henry Aaron or Cal Ripken), and sometimes they are held by jerks (e.g., Pete Rose or Ty Cobb.) A record doesn't even mean you were the best at what you did, because there is a lot of luck involved. Pete Rose (who scored more runs and made more hits than anyone else) was definitely not the greatest player who ever lived. Even Bonds, who was vastly more talented than Rose, had much luck on his side: He played a lot of years in an era when home runs were relatively easy to come by for a variety of reasons.
Bonds also played during an era when steroid use was common — and for most of his career, it was legal. It wasn't just a few sluggers who used the stuff: Many of the pitchers who threw to him and many of the fielders who tried to catch his batted balls were also users. Like all ballplayers, he was a child of his times.
Complaining that Bonds' record is invalid because of steroids makes about as much sense as complaining that Babe Ruth's record was invalid because he played during the era when the major leagues were all-white. (Ruth, by the way, played many off-season exhibition games against black players, and if you added the home runs he hit in those games, you would have a much higher total than his official 714.)
As for the Hall of Fame, it's basically just an exhibit in a museum in upstate New York. If a committee of baseball writers votes a player into the hall, he gets a plaque on a wall. Bonds will be just as famous (and just as infamous) with or without a plaque in that exhibit.
This controversy is probably not going to go away for many years. Bonds, for whatever reason, was a player who attracted hostility from commentators even back when he had only hit a few dozen home runs. And the steroids thing will go on for years: Even when his turn to be elected (or not) to the Hall of Fame comes around in 2013 or so, Alex Rodriguez (of the hated Yankees) will probably be about to break Bonds' record.
At least, in this case, we do know that Bonds truly did hit the most home runs. It's not like the last two presidential elections, where we don't know who actually got the most votes.
The writer is a resident of Durham.

Barry
Bonds swinging the bat (photo courtesy of Agência Brasil, a
public Brazilian news agency, under the Creative Commons License
Attribution 2.5 Brazil )
December 13, 2007: The Bonds story took a tragic turn (as if
the whole thing wasn't a tragedy to begin with) when he was indicted
for perjury on November 15, 2007. Actually, he is only ostensibly
being indicted for perjury: the allegedly perjurious statements were
all denials that he ever took performance enhancing drugs. Really, he
is being tried for taking steroids.
The Giants definitely will not be rehiring him in 2008, so he has to find another team— unless he retires of course. If he does retire, he ends up with 762 home runs, 2935 hits, 2227 runs scored,1996 RBIs, and a .298 batting average (not to mention an incredible 2558 walks.) He is within one season of several other significant landmarks, including 3000 hits and Rickey Henderson's record 2295 runs scored.
He has been talking to many other teams, but it is not clear that anyone will actually sign him. Aside from the public relations problems, he is asking for a lot of money and will likely be in court much of the 2008 season.
December 8, 2007 San Francisco Chronicle story (Bonds entered a not guilty plea on December 7 in federal court)
On December 13, 2007, Former Senator (US, Senator not Washington Senator) George Mitchell issued a lengthy tome entitled "REPORT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL OF AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO THE ILLEGAL USE OF STEROIDS AND OTHER PERFORMANCE ENHANCING SUBSTANCES BY PLAYERS IN MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL." The Mitchell Report named about 50 players. Bonds was one of them. (McGwire & Sosa were not.) It looks like Bonds may not even end up being the greatest player of all time not to be in the Hall of Fame: The legendary pitcher Roger Clemens was one of the players cited in the report.
The Mitchell Report (6.5MB PDF file. But, don't worry, the text is actually rendered as text in the PDF: the humongous file size is merely because of some scanned imagery in an appendix.)
Bonds's "hallowed" career home run record may not last that long anyway. Alex Rodriguez is just 31 years old and has already has 518 homers. Although he is still a long way away from 762, you gotta like A-Rod's chances of hitting 245 more home runs. In addition to being young. A-Rod is very consistent (and so far, at least) very durable. Jim Thome, Manny Ramirez and even Sammy Sosa (remember him?) also have semi-plausible shots at breaking the current record.
See Also: